# free psa total psa ratio calculation

The total PSA range of 4. Therefore, some urologists recommend using the free:total ratio to help select which men should undergo biopsy. However, even a negative result of prostate biopsy does not rule-out prostate cancer. The optimal cut-off values for diagnosis of CaP vary with the reports, mainly due to the differences in the number of cases examined, the objective total PSA range, total and free PSA assay systems. Catalona et al. Furthermore, this method which is simple to use, objective, and requires no speciale quipment is recommended for mass screening of CaP.

Google Scholar. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Sign In or Create an Account. Sign In. Advanced Search. Share on Pinterest Doctors can use the prostate-specific antigen test to detect signs of prostate cancer.

Understanding the free PSA test. Understanding the results. Share on Pinterest When total PSA levels are higher than the appropriate range, a person may have an increased risk of prostate cancer. Other factors that affect PSA levels. Free PSA or biopsy? Latest news Comprehensive study finds link between air pollution and mortality. Your doctor may advise one of these options:.

Necessary Information Include patient's age. Specimen Required Patient Preparation: For 12 hours before specimen collection do not take multivitamins or dietary supplements containing biotin vitamin B7 , which is commonly found in hair, skin, and nail supplements and multivitamins. Specimen Minimum Volume 0. We determined the likelihood ratio, which compares the proportion of people with and without the target disorder within a stratum of diagnostic test results.

We used the median likelihood ratios to evaluate the relative effects of positive and negative test results on probability revision with Bayes' theorem 37 :. For PSA levels between 4. Probability is converted to odds with the equation:. Using Bayes' theorem, we plotted the investigator-selected cut point for each study against the posttest probabilities for both positive and negative results.

Regression lines, fitted with Statistica Statsoft, Inc. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained following the methods of Moses and Littenberg. The purpose of this transformation was to linearize the data for linear regression analysis. To avoid having cells with zero, we added one-half to all counts in each cell.

Two additional terms were defined:. S was the sum of the two transforms and was related to the diagnostic cut point selected by the investigators. After estimating the slope and intercept of the transformed line, we back-transformed the line to yield a summary curve consistent with the TPR and FPR reported for each study.

If the confidence intervals for all studies overlapped the summary curve, then the studies were considered to be homogeneous. Sensitivity analyses were performed by classifying studies into subgroups according to methodologic criteria and comparing the D statistics. The nonparametric Mann Whitney U test was used for statistical comparisons. Overall, we retrieved 90 articles from an initial references identified by the literature search, but only 54 studies presented original diagnostic performance data.

An additional 16 studies were excluded because we could not abstract data for PSA values between 2. Table 1 shows the number of studies meeting the methodologic criteria used to evaluate validity and generalizability.

Thirteen studies used needle biopsy as the single reference standard, but none of them used long-term clinical follow-up to define true negative test results.

The other studies used a combination of reference standards including 4 72 , 80 , 85 , 86 using radical prostatectomy. Two studies did not perform biopsies on all control subjects. Six studies used free PSA testing in screening populations 74 , 76 , 77 , 83 , 89 , 91 ; the remaining studies either tested referral populations, often with frozen stored serum samples, or did not describe indications for testing.

The majority of studies failed to either describe eligibility criteria or to report on age, race, symptoms, digital rectal examination findings, and cancer stage. Table 2 shows the diagnostic performance data for the 17 studies presenting an investigator-selected cut point for PSA values between 2. Investigators generally selected these cut points to maximize sensitivity, although several studies selected cut points to maximize accuracy overall proportion of true positive and true negative tests 75 , 80 , 90 and 1 study maximized specificity.

The associated median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0. We found a logarithmic relationship between the cut point and posttest probability for positive tests. Investigator-selected cut points for the free-to-total PSA ratio are plotted against the posttest probabilities for positive and negative tests. PSA is an organ specific antigen and is secreted by the epithelial cells of the prostate.

Prostate-specific antigen PSA testing has changed early detection and management of prostate cancer dramatically since its introduction into clinical practice in the early s 4. Its introduction in daily urological practice has led to a significant rise in registered prostate cancer, for better and easier diagnosis of cancer. In the serum of healthy men in physiological conditions there is a very low concentration of PSA which has prostatic origin.

PSA in serum appears only in cases of disrupted microarchitecture of prostate tissue, and that is the reason that PSA crosses into the surrounding extracellular space, than by lymph it is flushed in the systemic circulation and is always an indication of trauma or prostate disease.

Elevated concentrations of PSA are found not only in patients with prostate cancer, but also in those with a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia BPH and prostatitis.

Today, PSA is considered to be the leading tumor marker in conducting evaluation of effectiveness of therapy of patients with prostate cancer, prognostic parameters, assessment of tumor mass, early detection of recurrence, and it is very useful in the screening and early diagnosis of prostate cancer. As member of human kallikrein family, PSA shares considerable structural and functional homology with all other 14 human kallikrein, together with gene location on the long arm of chromosome 19 19q PSA exists in three forms.

Prostate Specific Antigen Free. I returned in 2 months and the hemospermia seems to have cleared up. He took a new Psa after a DRE that was normal and the psa was 7.

My concern is that the PSA rose so quickly in 2 months. I also have BPH. Size 65 grms. Is it ok to wait 6 months? Hi, i,m 64 and 18 months ago my psa was around 0. I drink 2 gallons of milk a week and lots of eggs and cheese and dairy. Do i need a biopsy? I have an enlarged prostate and PSA readings between I am 64 and had one biopsy 4 years ago but want to avoid more! Could this FPSA be so high due to other factors like a mild infection etc.

Laboratory evarage up to 0. Thank you in advance ,best regards. With histopathological reports ware negative. So I am very much confused and anxious.

I am very grateful to have a advice and opinion about the results. I am 71 years old. The free PSA is 0. Should I be concerned? I am approaching 59 and healthy person. My latest test results were Total PSA of 2.

My DRE check up with Urologist specialist was normal. My Total PSA over the years have been around 2. Shall I continue as it is testing once a year? My consultant reassuring that everything is normal.

Also can diet help to improve results effectively? Many thanks. Regards, Alf. I am 44 years old I have a total psa of 5. I am confused please advise me of what this means. No meds except TRT since Annual DRE always completely non-remarkable. I am a man73years old and living in Iran. The result is as follows : Free PSA 0.

Send to urologist. Your honestly worrying about 0. Come on dude, is that really fair to all those on this site with scores of ? I have been taking Avodart for BPH for several years. My total PSA has been around 1. Doing the math I calculated the total PSA as 1. Please confirm if my calculations are correct: 0. Andre I am 59 years old. I have a TPSA of 4. There was mainly hypertrophy of the central zone, suggesting benign prostatic hyperplasia.

No focal lesin is seen in the peipheral zone. The contour of the prostat gland appears smooth. Biopsy of the protstae gland was perfomred and the procedure was unremarkable. Read on to learn more. African-American men are more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer, and are more likely to die from it.

About 1 in 9 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetime. Does what you eat really affect your risk for prostate cancer? If you load….